Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 50(5): 57-60, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2025812

ABSTRACT

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a common treatment for patients with allergic asthma and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. There is evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic could have altered the administration of AIT in patients in some countries, as the pandemic caused major limitations to healthcare access and delivery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the disruption imposed by the pandemic on the perceptions and administration of AIT therapies in Italy. An online survey was carried out among Italian allergists between 22 February 2021 and 12 April 2021. The results show that Italian physicians (N=66) did not consider that the COVID-19 pandemic presented an added risk to patients with allergic asthma or rhinitis receiving AIT. Although most treatments continued, there were reduced rates of AIT therapy initiations and sublingual AIT was favored over subcutaneous AIT.


Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Sublingual Immunotherapy , Asthma/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Humans , Pandemics
2.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 43(4): 299-304, 2022 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1933517

ABSTRACT

Adherence is crucial for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) efficacy, and a long-term 3-year adherence is indispensable for the long-term benefits beyond AIT administration. Nonadherence causes should be analyzed not only at the patient level but from a broader perspective, including socioeconomic factors, health-care system factors, and disorder- and therapy-related factors. Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) adherence is ∼50% at best and, for sublingual immunotherapy, the numbers are even much worse in some regions. In this review, causes for AIT loss of adherence and strategies, published and from personal experience, to reduce nonadherence are presented. Although the broader picture of causes of nonadherence has to be taken into account, in all this, the patient-physician and patient-health care professional (AIT nurse, assistant) are still in the center, and, in SCIT, each clinic visit for a shot is an opportunity to exploit this interaction in a positive way and stimulate adherence. Patient factors of nonadherence are not so much forgetfulness but more perception of ineffectiveness and adverse effects. An explanation of what can be expected before starting AIT is crucial because most of those who drop out are seen during the first year. Adherence is especially under risk when administration is temporarily interrupted (lockdown, illness, disease flare, vacation, preseasonal AIT administration schedules). The pandemic has caused higher rates of nonadherence specifically due to a fear of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, which can be mitigated with good hygiene techniques and strict sanitization protocols, which ensure the patients. Also, patient mobile discussion networks related to AIT can help encourage adherence and reduce fear of infection, even in these difficult times.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sublingual Immunotherapy , Communicable Disease Control , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Humans , Sublingual Immunotherapy/methods
3.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0261333, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1779728

ABSTRACT

Allergic airway disease is the most common chronic airway inflammatory disorder in developed countries. House dust mite, cockroach, and mold are the leading allergens in most tropical and subtropical countries, including Taiwan. As allergen avoidance is difficult for patients allergic to these perennial indoor allergens, allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) is the only available allergen-specific and disease-modifying treatment. However, for patients sensitized to multiple allergens, ASIT using each corresponding allergen is cumbersome. In the present study, we developed a recombinant L. lactis vaccine against the three most common indoor aeroallergens and investigated its effectiveness for preventing respiratory allergy and safety in mice. Three recombinant clones of Der p 2 (mite), Per a 2 (roach), and Cla c 14 (mold) were constructed individually in pNZ8149 vector and then electroporated into host strain L.lactis NZ3900. BALB/c mice were fed with the triple vaccine 5 times per week for 4 weeks prior to sensitization. The effectiveness and safety profile were then determined. Oral administration of the triple vaccine significantly alleviated allergen-induced airway hyper-responsiveness in the vaccinated mice. The allergen-specific IgG2a was upregulated. IL-4 and IL-13 mRNA expressions as well as inflammatory cell infiltration in the lungs decreased significantly in the vaccinated groups. No body weight loss or abnormal findings in the liver and kidneys were found in any of the groups of mice. This is the first report to describe a triple-aeroallergen vaccine using a food-grade lactococcal expression system. We developed a convenient oral delivery system and intend to extend this research to develop a vaccination that can be self-administered at home by patients.


Subject(s)
Allergens/chemistry , Asthma/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity/metabolism , Lactococcus lactis , Vaccines , Animals , Antigens, Dermatophagoides/chemistry , Antigens, Dermatophagoides/immunology , Arthropod Proteins/chemistry , Electroporation , Female , Fermentation , Insect Proteins , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Pyroglyphidae/immunology , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/prevention & control
4.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 21(6): 569-575, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1356717

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Molecular forms of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) are continuously emerging to improve the efficacy of the treatment, to shorten the duration of protocols and to prevent any side effects. The present review covers the recent progress in the development of AIT based on nucleic acid encoding allergens or CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG-ODN). RECENT FINDINGS: Therapeutic vaccinations with plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encoding major shrimp Met e 1 or insect For t 2 allergen were effective for the treatment of food or insect bite allergy in respective animal models. DNA expressing hypoallergenic shrimp tropomyosin activated Foxp3+ T regulatory (Treg) cells whereas DNA encoding For t 2 down-regulated the expression of pruritus-inducing IL-31. Co-administrations of major cat allergen Fel d 1 with high doses of CpG-ODN reduced Th2 airway inflammation through tolerance induction mediated by GATA3+ Foxp3hi Treg cells as well as early anti-inflammatory TNF/TNFR2 signaling cascade. Non-canonical CpG-ODN derived from Cryptococcus neoformans as well as methylated CpG sites present in the genomic DNA from Bifidobacterium infantis mediated Th1 or Treg cell differentiation respectively. SUMMARY: Recent studies on plasmid DNA encoding allergens evidenced their therapeutic potential for the treatment of food allergy and atopic dermatitis. Unmethylated or methylated CpG-ODNs were shown to activate dose-dependent Treg/Th1 responses. Large clinical trials need to be conducted to confirm these promising preclinical data. Moreover, tremendous success of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 must encourage as well the re-exploration of mRNA vaccine platform for innovative AIT.


Subject(s)
Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/therapy , Oligodeoxyribonucleotides/administration & dosage , Vaccines, DNA/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Allergens/administration & dosage , Allergens/genetics , Allergens/immunology , Animals , Clinical Trials as Topic , Desensitization, Immunologic/trends , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Oligodeoxyribonucleotides/genetics , Oligodeoxyribonucleotides/immunology , Plasmids/administration & dosage , Plasmids/genetics , Plasmids/immunology , Treatment Outcome , Vaccines, DNA/genetics , Vaccines, DNA/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/genetics , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology
5.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 21(4): 340-345, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1261063

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Drug allergy management has previously not been emphasized in the elderly. However, the geriatric population poses several unique characteristics, challenges for drug allergy testing and considerations in the management. Especially in the era of COVID-19, the elderly population is a vulnerable cohort and reviewing the management during this unprecedented time is both timely and relevant. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, larger scale studies focusing on the epidemiology and prevalence trends of drug allergies among older adults has been summarized in this review. Emphasis on anaphylaxis in the older adults has been studied. SUMMARY: There are many implications of these findings. Epidemiological studies are useful in realizing the burden and spectrum of drug allergies on our healthcare system. It has allowed us to identify certain barriers in drug allergy management and develop ways to overcome these challenges through. Lastly, we have proposed an approach to drug allergy management based on previous studies as well as from our perspective and local experience.


Subject(s)
Aging/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Global Burden of Disease , Age Factors , Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Drug Labeling , Humans , Prevalence , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
6.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 42(3): 187-197, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1226945

ABSTRACT

Background: Both, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and SARS-COV-2 infection cause a set of immunologic changes that respectively vary during the course of the treatment or the disease. Objective: To review immune changes brought along by each of these entities and how they might interrelate. Methods: We start presenting a brief review of the structure of the new coronavirus and how it alters the functioning of the human immune system. Subsequently, we describe the immune changes induced by AIT and how these changes could be favorable or unfavorable in the allergic patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 at a particular point of time during the evolving infection. Results: We describe how a healthy immune response against SARS-CoV-2 develops, versus an immune response that is initially suppressed by the virus, but ultimately overactivated, leading to an excessive production of cytokines (cytokine-storm-like). These changes are then linked to the clinical manifestations and outcomes of the patient. Reviewing the immune changes secondary to AIT, it becomes clear how AIT is capable of restoring a healthy innate immunity. Investigators have previously shown that the frequency of respiratory infections is reduced in allergic patients treated with AIT. On the other hand it also increases immunoregulation. Conclusion: As there are many variables involved, it is hard to predict how AIT could influence the allergic patient's reaction to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In any case, AIT is likely to be beneficial for the patient with allergic rhinitis and/or allergic asthma in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic as controlling allergic diseases leads to a reduced need for contact with healthcare professionals. The authors remind the reader that everything in this article is still theoretical, since at the moment, there are no published clinical trials on the outcome of COVID-19 in allergic patients under AIT.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Biomarkers, Pharmacological , COVID-19/therapy , Cytokine Release Syndrome , Humans , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Models, Immunological
8.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 182(7): 631-636, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1197289

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) is an effective treatment for allergic rhinitis, asthma, and venom allergy. Compliance is essential for SCIT to obtain maximal benefit as it is a long-term treatment. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the level of real-life SCIT compliance in pediatric patients and the associated factors. Additional aims were to determine how SCIT compliance was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and why some patients dropped out SCIT. METHOD: Pediatric patients diagnosed with allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma, or venom allergy that received SCIT between September 2012 and July 2020 were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 201 children (66.7% male) with a median (interquartile range) age of 12.8 years (9.4-15.2) at the time of the first SCIT injection. The overall compliance rate before COVID-19 pandemic was 86.1%. Short SCIT follow-up time and venom anaphylaxis were found to be risk factors for drop out. The leading causes of drop outs were moving to another city/country (32.1%), symptom improvement (17.8%), treatment ineffectiveness (14.2%), and adverse reactions (14.2%). Among the 108 patients that were still receiving SCIT during the COVID-19 pandemic, 31 (28.7%) dropped out the therapy. The most frequent reasons for drop-out were fear of being infected with COVID-19 (35.4%) and thinking that the AIT practise stopped due to COVID-19 pandemic (29%). Male gender and older age were found to be the independent risk factors for drop-out of SCIT. CONCLUSIONS: Real life compliance in children was found 13.9% and it was higher than adults. Nearly one-third of children dropped out during the CO-VID-19 pandemic. Male gender and older age are associated with SCIT drop-out during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Desensitization, Immunologic , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/therapy , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Child , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Desensitization, Immunologic/psychology , Desensitization, Immunologic/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Logistic Models , Male , Patient Compliance/psychology , Patient Dropouts/psychology , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Turkey
10.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 182(4): 324-338, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1076039

ABSTRACT

In this article, we propose that differences in COVID-19 morbidity may be associated with transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) and/or transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) activation as well as desensitization. TRPA1 and TRPV1 induce inflammation and play a key role in the physiology of almost all organs. They may augment sensory or vagal nerve discharges to evoke pain and several symptoms of COVID-19, including cough, nasal obstruction, vomiting, diarrhea, and, at least partly, sudden and severe loss of smell and taste. TRPA1 can be activated by reactive oxygen species and may therefore be up-regulated in COVID-19. TRPA1 and TRPV1 channels can be activated by pungent compounds including many nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2) (Nrf2)-interacting foods leading to channel desensitization. Interactions between Nrf2-associated nutrients and TRPA1/TRPV1 may be partly responsible for the severity of some of the COVID-19 symptoms. The regulation by Nrf2 of TRPA1/TRPV1 is still unclear, but suggested from very limited clinical evidence. In COVID-19, it is proposed that rapid desensitization of TRAP1/TRPV1 by some ingredients in foods could reduce symptom severity and provide new therapeutic strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diet therapy , COVID-19/immunology , NF-E2-Related Factor 2/immunology , Nutrients/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , TRPA1 Cation Channel/immunology , TRPV Cation Channels/immunology , Antioxidants/metabolism , Biomarkers/metabolism , Brassica , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Down-Regulation , Humans , Oxidative Stress/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Severity of Illness Index , Up-Regulation
11.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 9(2): 702-708, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-943256

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: According to expert consensus, the time interval between Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy (VIT) injections can be extended up to 12 weeks, without significant impact on efficacy and safety. However, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic caused longer delays, and no recommendations are available to manage this huge extension. OBJECTIVES: To provide advice on how to resume VIT safely after a long delay from the last injection considering the potential risk factors for side effects, without starting again with the induction phase. METHODS: All the patients who delayed VIT because of the pandemic were consecutively enrolled in this single-center study. The time extension was decided according to their risk profile (eg, long prepandemic time interval, severe pre-VIT reaction, older age, multitreatments), and correlation analyses were performed to find potential risk factors of side effects. RESULTS: The mean delay from the pre- (7 weeks) to the postpandemic VIT interval (15.5 weeks) was 8.5 weeks. The total amount of the prepandemic VIT maintenance dose was safely administered in 1 day in 78% of patients, whereas only 3, of 87, experienced side effects, and their potential risk factors were identified in bee venom allergy and recent VIT initiation. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, long VIT delays may be safe and well tolerated, but more caution should be paid in resuming VIT in patients with long prepandemic maintenance interval, severe pre-VIT reaction, recent VIT initiation, older age, multidrug treatments, and bee venom allergy. This is useful in any case of long, unplanned, and unavoidable VIT delay.


Subject(s)
Bee Venoms/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/therapy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Aged , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Adherence and Compliance
12.
Contact Dermatitis ; 83(5): 432-435, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-767205

ABSTRACT

Although the development of successful vaccines against coronaviruses may be achieved, for some individuals the immune response that they stimulate may prove to be insufficient for effective host defence. The principle that a relatively strong contact allergen will have an enhancing effect on sensitization compared with a less potent contact allergen if they are co-administered, may not, at first, appear relevant to this issue. However, this augmentation effect is thought to be due to the sharing of common or complementary pathways. Here, we briefly consider aspects of the shared and complementary pathways between skin sensitization induced by exposure to a contact allergen and the immune response to viruses, with particular reference to COVID-19. The relationship leads us to explore whether this principle, which we name here as "co-operative immune augmentation" may be extended to include viral vaccination. We consider evidence that even relatively weak contact allergens, used in vaccines for other purposes, can show enhanced sensitization, which is in keeping with a co-operative augmentation principle. Finally, we consider how the potent contact allergen diphenylcyclopropenone could be employed safely as an enhancer of vaccine responses.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cyclopropanes/therapeutic use , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Viral Vaccines/therapeutic use , Allergens/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Female , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 67(2): 199-201, 2020.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-745631
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL